God In Search Of Man
Heschel’s 1955 book God in Search of Man, and the earlier companion volume Man Is Not Alone (1951), exemplify a theme that runs throughout much of Heschel’s life and work: That God needs human beings as partners in establishing justice and restoring wholeness to the world. This radical understanding of the relationship between human beings and the divine is revealed in the biblical covenant between God and Israel. God chooses to need human beings, and in so doing, God takes a risk on being disappointed, frustrated, and even betrayed by humankind. In Heschel’s thinking, God experiences “divine pathos;” that is, God is emotionally affected by the actions of humankind, for good and for ill. At the same time, human beings can help make God more present in and to the world by their actions on behalf of justice, compassion, love, and mercy—the very qualities God represents. This process of restoration is humankind’s sacred duty. It is how human beings fulfill their part of the covenant with the divine. This “partnership” is the true origin of religion and the theological foundation for Heschel’s own involvement in movements for civil and human rights, for peacemaking, and in support of the marginalized. God and people must work together to repair the world.
Questions to Consider
- Heschel wrote his dissertation on the prophets as Nazism was gaining influence in Germany. In what ways might his interpretation of the prophets reflect Heschel’s own circumstances as a Jew in Germany in the early 1930s?
- In the film, Shai Held suggests that Heschel went back to the prophets at times when the need to assert human dignity and justice was greatest. That is, in the 1930s in Germany and again in the 1960s in America. (Heschel published The Prophets in 1962.) For Heschel, the Hebrew prophets were foremost advocates for social justice. Do you agree with this interpretation of the prophets? Do they have special relevance in times when human dignity and the ideal of justice are threatened?
How might some German scholars’ dismissal of the Hebrew Bible in the 1920s and ‘30s, largely due to anti-Semitism have influenced the German church’s ability to counter Nazism?
- What, according to Heschel, are the primary characteristics of a prophet? Are the Hebrew prophets men and women with a special knowledge of the future or a special knowledge of or identification with God?
- Susannah Heschel suggests that it was their shared appreciation for the Hebrew prophets that cemented the friendship of Heschel and Martin Luther King, Jr. and which drove much of their own activism. Do you see a connection here between Heschel’s interpretation of the prophets’ message and the work of both men in civil rights, against the war in Vietnam, and on behalf of marginalized groups (in Heschel’s case, Jews under Soviet oppression)?
- Arnold Eisen suggests that Heschel’s work on the prophets is a “call to action,” a challenge to modern-day readers to address injustice and inequity and to challenge oppressive authority as the Hebrew prophets did. Is this how you read the prophets, as exemplars of a way of living and of action that contemporary readers are to follow?
- Heschel interprets the Hebrew prophets as men who are imbued with the divine pathos; that is, they feel what God feels for humankind and experience God’s own joy or disappointment at human behavior. Can you imagine feeling what God feels? Do you envision God as having feelings or emotions, or of being affected by human actions in any way? Does this seem plausible to you?
- At a birthday celebration for Heschel shortly before his own death, Martin Luther King, Jr. called Heschel a “true prophet.” In fact, both men have been described as prophets by others within and beyond their own lifetimes. Do you consider Heschel a prophet? Do you think he saw himself as one, or simply someone who helped amplify the voices of the classical prophets?
- Like the ancient Hebrew prophets, Heschel also critiqued the religious institutions of his time, seeing much of contemporary Judaism as being wrapped in platitudes and inauthentic rituals. Is there a place for the prophet in critiquing contemporary religious practices, in whatever tradition? Is this a helpful role, in your opinion, or a destructive one? Can the prophet ever be a popular figure?
What price do prophets pay for challenging the status quo, in ancient times or today? Did Heschel pay a price for some of his stances, especially regarding civil rights and the Vietnam War?
- Biblical scholar Walter Brueggemann praises Heschel for going beyond the established historical approach to the prophets. What do you think Heschel adds to the centuries-old discussion and understanding of the Hebrew prophets? What role does poetry and metaphor play in Heschel’s conception of the prophet?
Follow Us on Social Media
Address: 1413 King Street, Alexandria, Virginia 22314 | Phone: (703) 519-8200, 1-800-486-1070 | Email: email@example.com